Bill Bailey

North Carolina Lawmakers Approve Medical Malpractice Reform

Sep 4, 2006

North Carolina lawmakers have agreed to set caps on medical malpractice awards.  A new bill in the state will cap monetary damages for certain healthcare negligence cases.  The legislation, which was unanimously approved by the House, allows plaintiffs and defendants to have their cases settled by an arbitrator selected by both sides, or by the court at the parties' request.  Under the bill, hearings would begin within 10 months of the parties agreeing to enter into arbitration.  The arbitrator would have to issue a decision within two weeks of the hearing's close, and all monetary damages would be limited to $1 million.  Few appeals would be allowed. The measure had the support of both the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers and the North Carolina Medical SocietyThe Politically Active Physicians Association, a group formed by concerned Pennsylvania medical practitioners to ensure quality medical care is delivered to patients, recently held a debate with Governor Ed Rendell concerning the state's medical liability crisis. The debate was sparked by Governor Rendell's announcement on the eve of his reelection campaign that "We've turned the corner" on Pennsylvania's medical liability crisis. Since that time, deaths due to diminishing access to physician care have increased, several hospitals have closed down, and more doctors have been forced out of business. Governor Rendell, who opposes medical liability reform, employs a leading anti-tort reform advocate from the Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association as his top spokesman and recently vetoed bipartisan legislation that would prevent lawyers from pursuing defendants for more than their fair share of the damages in cases that involve multiple parties. (Politically Active Physicians Association, 9/4)

NIMH Grant Awarded To Rutgers Center For Behavioral Health Services, Criminal Justice Research

"Tan Jab" Is An Unlicensed Medicine And May Not Be Safe - Warns Medicines Regulator

Interpol Seizes $6.65M In Counterfeit HIV/AIDS, Malaria, TB Drugs In Southeast Asia

Nurse Struck Off After Assault On Teenager

Illinois Supreme Court Orders State To Restart Payments To Medicaid Providers; New Hampshire Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Medicaid Lawsuit

Increasing Number Of Countries Criminalizing HIV Transmission

Advocacy Groups File Lawsuit Against VA Over Disability Claims Delays

Supreme Court Should Rule In Favor Of Plaintiff In Pre-Emption Case, Editorial States

British Teenager Wins Right To Refuse Heart Transplant

Frequently Asked Questions About Malpractice Insurance For Nurses

Editorials Address Supreme Court Case On Pre-Emption

Doctors Need Insurance For New Mental Capacity Assessments Warns Medical Defence Union, UK

Wyeth Not Responsible For Plaintiff Injury In Pre-Emption Case, Company Official Writes

Letter, Opinion Piece Address Supreme Court Case Regarding Drug Safety, Federal Pre-Emption

Justice Department Investigates Vytorin Marketing, More Lawsuits Face Merck, Schering

North Carolina Department Of Health And Human Services Settles With Dominion Healthcare

Continued Damage From Banned Obesity Drug Revealed By Study

Concern, Misperceptions Describe Physician Views On CMS "Never Event" Policy, QuantiaMD Finds

Federal Court Says Bush Administration Policy To Pay Only For Least Costly Alternative Not Permitted Under Medicare Law

Moonlighting Nurse Struck Off, UK

Nurse Struck Off For Errors On Clinical Trials

Two Employer Groups File 'Friend-Of-The-Court' Brief Saying That Healthy San Francisco Program Violates ERISA

Supreme Court Hears Opening Arguments In Wyeth V. Levine; Some Appear To Support Limited Pre-Emption

Supreme Court To Hear Opening Arguments In Case Regarding Drug Safety, Federal Pre-Emption

EU Moves Must Not Put GPs At Catch-22 Risk, Warns Medical And Dental Defence Union Of Scotland

Weekly Tip: Did you know that risk management starts even with the Initial Consultation?

The initial contact with the patient is usually through your receptionist. This employee should be well-coached as to the limitations on information that can be conveyed. An example of this might be: avoid discussing aspects of a procedure that would be better left to you, as the physician.